[WWdevel] Re: CVS alternative

[Michael Gage]

>
>  Problems start in the non-tagged side, basically however we find 
> them.  Once this thing is initialized, I guess we can start filling 
> that up with lots of pg files.  When it gets tagged, then it is moved 
> to the tagged-side, which will be organized to mirror the heirarchical 
> topic structure of the database.
>
>  We may not be able to "polish" every problem, but as that is done, it 
> simply gives an updated version of the problem on the tagged side.  
> The setup as described above basically gives up on the notion of 
> systematically polishing problems.  If we want to keep that alive, we 
> should have 3 basic sub-divisions (raw, tagged, and 
> tagged-and-polished).  Actually, this 3-part version might be a good 
> way to go.
>
I like the 3 part version.  Possibly even a 4th part for  problems 
which can be used as models for future problems (exhibiting best 
practices, etc. etc.)  This fourth part could be fairly small however, 
and may not need to be a CVS.

Take care,

Mike


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 995 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://webwork.maa.org/pipermail/webwork-devel/attachments/20050110/15b4be0f/attachment.bin>