RecursivelyDefinedFunctions

Recursively Defined Functions

This PG code shows how to check student answers that are recursively defined functions.

Problem Techniques Index

PG problem file	Explanation
DOCUMENT(); loadMacros( "PGstandard.pl", "MathObjects.pl", "parserFunction.pl", ); TEXT(beginproblem());	Initialization: We will be defining a new named function and adding it to the context, and the easiest way to do this is using parserFunction.pl. There is a more basic way to add functions to the context, which is explained in example 2 at AddingFunctions
Context("Numeric")->variables->are(n=>"Real"); parserFunction(f => "sin(pi^n)+e"); $fn = Formula("3 f(n-1) + 2");	Setup: We define a new named function f as something the student is unlikely to guess. The named function f</codee> is, in some sense, just a placeholder since the student will enter things like f(n-1), WeBWorK will interpret it internally as sin(pi^(n-1))+e, and the only thing the student sees is f(n-1). If the recursion has an closed-form solution (e.g., the Fibonacci numbers are given by f(n) = (a^n - (1-a)^n)/sqrt(5) where a = (1+sqrt(5))/2), it would be good to define f using that explicit solution in case the student tries to answer the question by writing out the explicit solution (a^n - (1-a)^n)/sqrt(5) instead of using the shorthand f(n).
BEGIN_TEXT The current value \( f(n) \) is three times the previous value plus two. Find a recursive definition for \( f(n) \). Enter \( f_{n-1} \) as \( f(n-1) \). $BR \( f(n) \) = \{ ans_rule(20) \} END_TEXT	Main Text: The problem text section of the file is as we'd expect. We should tell students to use function notation rather than subscript notation so that they aren't confused about syntax.
$showPartialCorrectAnswers=1; ANS( $fn->cmp() ); ENDDOCUMENT();	Answer Evaluation: As is the answer.

Problem Techniques Index