Difference between revisions of "GoodProblems"

From WeBWorK_wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 19: Line 19:
   
 
* Add some sort of ranking system in the NPL
 
* Add some sort of ranking system in the NPL
  +
* NPL branching: should/could there be a curated version of the NPL that would try to eliminate duplication? What standards could we use? (This list of heuristics, or a rubric score?)
   
 
==Rubric==
 
==Rubric==

Revision as of 16:46, 2 June 2011

Prep Main Page > Web Conference 2 > Good Problems

Heuristics

  • Problems have a clear sense of what they are trying to do (e.g., develop skills, develop understanding, evaluate student understanding, etc.)
  • Problems follow Best Practices
  • Problems have "nice enough" numbers
  • The problems are clean and clear (and well-written)
    • It is clear from the problem what answer is expected of the student
  • The concepts that are being communicated and evaluated are clear
  • They have hints and solutions: support for students who are stuck or who lack other support structures
  • The written solutions inform the manner in which the problem is framed
  • They are stable and well tested
  • The problem has a clear learning objective
    • The problem is written to promote students' accomplishment of the learning objective
  • Problems are accessible to screen readers and other accessibility tools
    • The problems provide a good idea of what is being asked when a hardcopy is generated (drop down messages, colors on graphs, graph scaling, and table size)


  • Add some sort of ranking system in the NPL
  • NPL branching: should/could there be a curated version of the NPL that would try to eliminate duplication? What standards could we use? (This list of heuristics, or a rubric score?)

Rubric

Problem Type Problem Should Have Problem Should Not Have
Skill/practice (e.g., find derivative)
Conceptual/multipart

Alternate formulation

Problem Type Problem Should Have Problem Should Not Have
Fill in the blank/Select an answer
Numerical
Formula