Difference between revisions of "Graph Object Documentation"

From WeBWorK_wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Construct a plan for simplying the use of graphics in <a href="../mod/wiki/view.php?wid=2&userid=0&groupid=0&page=WeBWorK" title="Wiki" class="wiki autolink">WeBWorK</a> questions. We wou...)
 
m (marked as historical)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Construct a plan for simplying the use of graphics in <a href="../mod/wiki/view.php?wid=2&userid=0&groupid=0&page=WeBWorK" title="Wiki" class="wiki autolink">WeBWorK</a> questions. We would hope to make the syntax for <span style="font-weight: bold;">graphics</span> more closely aligned with <a href="../mod/wiki/view.php?wid=5&userid=0&groupid=0&page=MathObjects" title="Wiki" class="wiki autolink">MathObjects</a> in order to simplify the learning curve for authoring <a href="../mod/wiki/view.php?wid=2&userid=0&groupid=0&page=WeBWorK" title="Wiki" class="wiki autolink">WeBWorK</a> questions. This document should contain a group consensus on specifications for the new syntax.<br /><br />Similarly we'd like to make the <span style="font-weight: bold;">SelectList</span> objects (matching, true/false, list of short answers) more similar to the <a href="../mod/wiki/view.php?wid=5&userid=0&groupid=0&page=MathObjects" title="Wiki" class="wiki autolink">MathObjects</a> paradigm.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Fractions</span> are another candidate for reform
 
  +
{{Historical}}
   
  +
Construct a plan for simplying the use of graphics in WeBWorK questions.
  +
We would hope to make the syntax for ''graphics'' more closely aligned with MathObjects
  +
in order to simplify the learning curve for authoring WeBWorK questions.
  +
This document should contain a group consensus on specifications for the new syntax.
   
   
[http://devel.webwork.rochester.edu/doc/cvs/pg_HEAD/macros/PGgraphmacros.pl.html POD] documentation for the current version of graph objects. (POD stands for Plain Old Documentation :-) )
 
  +
Similarly we'd like to make the ''SelectList'' objects (matching, true/false, list of short answers)
  +
more similar to the MathObjects paradigm.
   
[Graph Object]
 
  +
Fractions are another candidate for reform
  +
  +
  +
  +
[http://webwork.maa.org/pod/pg/macros/PGgraphmacros.html POD] documentation for the current version of graph objects. (POD stands for Plain Old Documentation :-) )
  +
  +
Here is our plan:
  +
  +
[[Graph Object Wishlist]]
  +
  +
  +
[[Category:AIMWeBWorK Working Groups]]

Latest revision as of 12:18, 16 June 2021

This article has been retained as a historical document. It is not up-to-date and the formatting may be lacking. Use the information herein with caution.

Construct a plan for simplying the use of graphics in WeBWorK questions. We would hope to make the syntax for graphics more closely aligned with MathObjects in order to simplify the learning curve for authoring WeBWorK questions. This document should contain a group consensus on specifications for the new syntax.


Similarly we'd like to make the SelectList objects (matching, true/false, list of short answers) more similar to the MathObjects paradigm.

Fractions are another candidate for reform


POD documentation for the current version of graph objects. (POD stands for Plain Old Documentation :-) )

Here is our plan:

Graph Object Wishlist