Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From WeBWorK_wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(When Fads Unravel)
m (added tag)
 
(189 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When investing, it can be difficult to determine whether the fired-up growth stock you're eyeing is actually just a fad. People who invested in Crocs at the stock's crazy highs have learned the perils of such a situation. The shoe company's fourth-quarter results provide little reason for anybody to believe that Crocs shares can regain their former overpriced glory.
 
  +
<strong>MediaWiki has been installed.</strong>
   
Crocs did beat analysts' expectations. However, it reported a net loss of $33.2 million, or $0.40 per share, compared to a profit of $38.3 million, or $0.45 per share, during the same period last year. The fourth-quarter net loss included major foreign exchange rate losses; without those, the company still would have reported a net loss of $17.1 million, or $0.20 per share. Revenue plunged 43.9% to $126.1 million.
 
  +
Consult the [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents User's Guide] for information on using the wiki software.
   
Crocs also forecast a net loss for the first quarter, guiding in the range of $0.32 to $0.17 per share.
 
  +
== Welcome back ==
   
The company emphasized its improved cash position, accounts receivable, and inventory levels, and these are of course important elements. Cash is king these days, and Crocs' major inventory buildup and mounting accounts receivables hinted at big trouble on the way when the stock first began its downward spiral. However, Crocs' constant emphasis on the poor economy's negative impact may be a bit misleading. Although I have no doubt that the consumer spending slowdown is taking a bite out of Crocs, it's also been clear that the fad element of the company's shoes is rapidly unraveling. That implies that the heady growth of yesteryear is over, even when consumer spending revives.
 
  +
We are slowly getting the addresses restored. As of 03/09/2020:
  +
* wiki: https://webwork.maa.org/wiki
  +
* bugzilla: https://bugs.webwork.maa.org
  +
* request tracker: https://rt.webwork.maa.org
  +
* forums (moodle): https://webwork.maa.org/forums
  +
* blog aggregator (planet): https://webwork.maa.org/planet
   
Faddish stocks like Crocs and Heelys are dangerous for investors, even if Microsoft founder Bill Gates apparently believes that Crocs is a good stock.
 
  +
== Getting started with mediawiki in general ==
  +
* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Configuration_settings Configuration settings list]
  +
* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:FAQ MediaWiki FAQ]
  +
* [https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-announce MediaWiki release mailing list]
  +
* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Localisation#Translation_resources Localise MediaWiki for your language]
  +
* [https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Manual:Combating_spam Learn how to combat spam on your wiki]
   
Navigating the dire economy won't be easy for discretionary stocks like Crocs. Fellow footwear maker Skechers recently got trampled. On the other hand, these tough times could provide investing opportunities. I've wanted to take a deeper look at Deckers lately; its UGG boots may be a fad, but they've shown remarkable staying power for years now, remaining hot even through last year's holiday shopping season.
 
  +
[[Category:WeBWorK_Project]]
 
But in Crocs' case, I continue to firmly advise investors to steer clear. Even though it may look cheap trading in penny stock territory, I don't believe it will ever come near its former growth rates. Buyer, beware.
 
 
 
 
I love uggs .
 
 
Buy cheap ugg boots .
 

Latest revision as of 19:32, 22 June 2021

MediaWiki has been installed.

Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.

Welcome back

We are slowly getting the addresses restored. As of 03/09/2020:

Getting started with mediawiki in general