Difference between revisions of "NPLNotes"

From WeBWorK_wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 10: Line 10:
   
 
===Issues===
 
===Issues===
  +
  +
Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.?
   
 
====Additional Metadata====
 
====Additional Metadata====
Line 16: Line 18:
 
* Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites?
 
* Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites?
 
** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script?
 
** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script?
* Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints.
+
* Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical.
   
 
====Missing Functionality====
 
====Missing Functionality====
Line 23: Line 25:
 
* Would a full text search be useful? Possible?
 
* Would a full text search be useful? Possible?
 
* Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts
 
* Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts
  +
* Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL?
   
 
====Redundancy====
 
====Redundancy====

Revision as of 16:16, 15 June 2011

Prep Main Page > Web Conference 4 > NPL Notes

Notes on the NPL: What it has, What it needs

The NPL was created by Jeff Holt, John Jones and Bill Ziemer.

Organization

By default, we see a page with subject, chapter, section.

Issues

Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.?

Additional Metadata

  • Learning objectives (can this be addressed by more or better keyword tagging, and/or semantic tagging?)
  • Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites?
    • When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script?
  • Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical.

Missing Functionality

  • Keyword tagging is very uneven. Can this be improved?
  • Would a full text search be useful? Possible?
  • Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts
  • Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL?

Redundancy

There are a lot of problems that are very similar. How can we address issue?

  • Group problems by cohort, so that one of the problems is displayed, and the rest of the cohort could be displayed on request.