Difference between revisions of "NPLNotes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Issues=== |
===Issues=== |
||
+ | |||
+ | Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.? |
||
====Additional Metadata==== |
====Additional Metadata==== |
||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
* Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites? |
* Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites? |
||
** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script? |
** When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script? |
||
− | * Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints. |
+ | * Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical. |
====Missing Functionality==== |
====Missing Functionality==== |
||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
* Would a full text search be useful? Possible? |
* Would a full text search be useful? Possible? |
||
* Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts |
* Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts |
||
+ | * Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL? |
||
====Redundancy==== |
====Redundancy==== |
Revision as of 16:16, 15 June 2011
Prep Main Page > Web Conference 4 > NPL Notes
Contents
Notes on the NPL: What it has, What it needs
The NPL was created by Jeff Holt, John Jones and Bill Ziemer.
Organization
By default, we see a page with subject, chapter, section.
Issues
Should there be a "new" NPL that we should consider? Either peer reviewed, or with reduced redundancy, etc.?
Additional Metadata
- Learning objectives (can this be addressed by more or better keyword tagging, and/or semantic tagging?)
- Frequency of use, or number of errors per problem; could this be gathered from remote sites?
- When should this be done? Browser, or instructor based---so an instructor could submit the use by course; or as something that runs from the NPL-Update script?
- Ability to tell, from the library browser, which problems have solutions or hints; or which problems use MathObjects; or which are graphical.
Missing Functionality
- Keyword tagging is very uneven. Can this be improved?
- Would a full text search be useful? Possible?
- Ability to restrict the text editions that are displayed in the library browser---either by having the WeBWorK administrator check the texts that would be displayed, or by grandfathering out of existence some of the older texts
- Peer review. Should there be a peer reviewed NPL?
Redundancy
There are a lot of problems that are very similar. How can we address issue?
- Group problems by cohort, so that one of the problems is displayed, and the rest of the cohort could be displayed on request.