Difference between revisions of "PREP 2011 Web Conference II"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
## Meta-context may also be important |
## Meta-context may also be important |
||
# Discussion of assessment and what makes a good problem, what factors are not conducive to problems usefulness; consider heuristics and rules. |
# Discussion of assessment and what makes a good problem, what factors are not conducive to problems usefulness; consider heuristics and rules. |
||
| − | ## Develop rubric page |
||
| + | ## Look at sample problem list. |
||
| − | ## Develop ideas that may not be directly connected with the rubric, but which will be useful |
||
| + | ## Develop rubric page. |
||
| + | ## Develop ideas that may not be directly connected with the rubric, but which will be useful. |
||
===Conference material=== |
===Conference material=== |
||
Revision as of 11:37, 2 June 2011
Prep Main Page > Web Conference 2
Contents
Web-Conference 2:
Date: June 2, 3-5pm EDT
Presenters: Jason Aubrey, Dan Flath, Gavin LaRose
Resources
Agenda
- Discussion of the problems that were written for the assignment for this conference
- Problem authoring issues and questions
- Discuss papers on assessment/usability
- Problem intent, and the degree to which this will be obvious or work for the student
- Meta-context may also be important
- Discussion of assessment and what makes a good problem, what factors are not conducive to problems usefulness; consider heuristics and rules.
- Look at sample problem list.
- Develop rubric page.
- Develop ideas that may not be directly connected with the rubric, but which will be useful.
Conference material
- Discussion of the problems that were written for the assignment for this conference
- Clarify any questions about problem structure
- Discuss problems that are specifically "good" or "bad"
- Go through and critique/comment on problems developed from assignment from first workshop---check code and usability (some error checking, mostly style and quality of problems)
- Discuss papers on assessment/usability
- Discussion of assessment and what makes a good problem, what factors are not conducive to problems usefulness. some heuristics:
- Problems have a clear sense of what they are trying to do (e.g., develop skills, develop understanding, evaluate student understanding, etc.)
- Problems follow Best Practices
- Problems have "nice enough" numbers
- The problems are clean and clear (and well-written)
- The concepts that are being communicated and evaluated are clear
- They have hints and solutions: support for students who are stuck or who lack other support structures
- They are stable and well tested
- From this discussion, develop a rubric for assessing quality (technical and pedagogical) of WeBWorK problems; this is a Wiki page
- Possibly include: discussion of different types of problems---fill in the blank, numerical, etc.
Follow-up
- Revise wiki on good problems to reflect discussion
Assignment for web conference 3
- Continue work on rubric
- Explore NPL and evaluate some number of problems for the model course on which each person is working with the established rubric
- Identify some good problems, or sub-optimal problems with suggestions to improve them, probably based on the rubric. This should also improve the rubric.
- Specifically give 3-5 problems, types of problems or NPL information to look for, e.g.,
- How many problems are available for the Hughes-Hallett calculus text, section 4.3?
- Are these specifically good
- What non-calculus courses have NPL problems?
- Can we tell which textbook problems we're finding?
