Difference between revisions of "TCEC Swiss Tournament System"
m (→STEP 5) |
m (→Playing order within a round) |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | TCEC Swiss Tournament System is a variant of the Swiss tournament format. It is completely deterministic with a reasonably simple rule set, resembling the Monrad system. It can be played with any number of participants and any number of rounds. Rounds are either single or double rounds. It is designed to be played with 40-50 engines over 10-25 rounds | + | TCEC Swiss Tournament System is a variant of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss-system_tournament Swiss tournament format]. It is completely deterministic with a reasonably simple rule set, resembling the [https://web.archive.org/web/20070706122207/http://www.sjakk.no/nsf/monradsystem_index.html Monrad system]. It can be played with any number of participants and any number of rounds. Rounds are either single or double rounds. It is designed to be played with 40-50 engines over 10-25 rounds. |
= General structure = | = General structure = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Tiebreakers (e.g., number of black games DESC, SB, r-mobility score) | * Tiebreakers (e.g., number of black games DESC, SB, r-mobility score) | ||
− | = | + | Recommendations: |
+ | * Even number of players | ||
+ | * When single rounds format is used, it is recommended to have an odd number of rounds for color balancing. There is no such recommendation for double rounds format. | ||
+ | * Number of rounds should generally be at most the number of players divided by 2 (approximately). If more rounds are desired, then it may be preferable to use a round-robin tournament format, instead. | ||
+ | * For player seeding, use either: | ||
+ | ** Group seeding. (Use group count = players / 2 (round down) for equal distance seeding.) | ||
+ | ** Random seeding | ||
− | Every player is assigned a unique seeding number. This determines the | + | = Seeding = |
+ | |||
+ | Every player is assigned a unique seeding number. This determines the pairing order in the first round and is used as a secondary ordering criterion in the following rounds. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following seeding procedures are defined: | ||
+ | * '''Random seeding'''. | ||
+ | * '''Group seeding'''. The procedure is as follows: | ||
+ | ** Order the players by Elo rating (highest first) | ||
+ | ** Divide the players into N roughly equal sized groups: Group A = strongest players, Group B = next strongest, etc. If the division is not even, then have stronger groups with one more player than the weaker groups. | ||
+ | *** For example: 11 players into 4 groups: Groups A-C have 4 players and D has 3 players | ||
+ | ** For increasing seeding numbers, first pick a player from group A, then from group B, then from group C, etc, and reiterate from group A until every player has been seeded. Pick always the strongest unseeded player from a group | ||
+ | *** For example: 11 players in 4 groups. S1=A1, S2=B1, S3=C1, S4=D1, S5=A2, ... (S<n> = seed n, A1 is strongest player in group A) | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
− | * Equal distance seeding may be used to promote the expected top encounters | + | * Equal distance seeding may be used to promote the expected top encounters as late as possible |
+ | * Random seeding also works | ||
+ | * The 1st round pairing is: seed2-seed1, seed4-seed3, seed6-seed5, ... | ||
= Round pairing = | = Round pairing = | ||
Line 48: | Line 67: | ||
== STEP 3 == | == STEP 3 == | ||
− | Determine whether there exists a ''viable pairing'' for the round | + | Determine whether there exists a ''viable pairing'' for the round. If no viable pairings exist, remove the earliest round in the encounter history. Repeat this as necessary until a viable pairing exists. The removals are permanent, ''i.e.'', they carry over to the following rounds. |
+ | |||
+ | Players ''p1'' and ''p2'' are allowed to be paired if all of the below conditions are met: | ||
+ | * The players have not yet met as per the encounter history | ||
+ | * The color balancing conditions: | ||
+ | ** If either player has white game difference +2, then the other player must have white game difference of at most 0. | ||
+ | ** If either player has white game difference -2, then the other player must have white game difference of at least 0. | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
− | * The | + | * White game difference for player ''p'' = WGD(''p'') = (games played by player ''p'' with the white pieces) - (games played by player ''p'' with the back pieces) |
+ | ** WGD(p) is unaffected by the possible round removals in the encounter history | ||
+ | * The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blossom_algorithm Blossom algorithm] can be used to determine efficiently whether there exists a viable pairing. Create a graph where the players are represented by vertices and the allowed pairings are represented by non-directional edges. That is, edge ''p1-p2'' exists iff: | ||
+ | ** Players ''p1'' and ''p2'' have not met (as per the encounter history); and | ||
+ | ** The color balancing conditions between ''p1'' and ''p2'' are met. That is: |WGD(p1) + WGD(p2)| <= 2 | ||
+ | * When there are an even number of players (i.e., no BYE rounds), then the color balancing conditions ensure that every player has white game difference +1 or -1 after an odd number of rounds. | ||
== STEP 4 == | == STEP 4 == | ||
Line 57: | Line 87: | ||
Perform pairing. The players are paired one by one in the pairing order as follows: | Perform pairing. The players are paired one by one in the pairing order as follows: | ||
* Pick the first unpaired player by the pairing order. Mark the player as paired. This player is called the first-of-pair. | * Pick the first unpaired player by the pairing order. Mark the player as paired. This player is called the first-of-pair. | ||
− | * Pick the highest-ranked player as the second-of-pair that maintains the following criteria: | + | * Pick the highest-ranked unpaired player as the second-of-pair that maintains the following criteria: |
− | ** The | + | ** The pairing condition is met (see STEP 3); and |
− | ** The viability of the round pairing is maintained | + | ** The viability of the round pairing is maintained (see STEP 3) |
Do this until every player has been paired. Add pairs in the encounter history for this round. | Do this until every player has been paired. Add pairs in the encounter history for this round. | ||
Line 69: | Line 99: | ||
Determine playing colors for each pair: | Determine playing colors for each pair: | ||
− | * '''Single rounds.''' Determine which player of has the greater white game difference (i.e., games played as white - games played as black). The player with the greater white game difference gets the black pieces. In case the difference equals, then the player with the higher score gets the black pieces. If both players have the same score, then the following formula is used: | + | * '''Single rounds.''' Determine which player of the pair has the greater white game difference (i.e., games played as white - games played as black). The player with the greater white game difference gets the black pieces. In case the difference equals, then the player with the higher score gets the black pieces. If both players have the same score, then the following formula is used: |
** First-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, ... (first-of-pair has lower seed number) | ** First-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, ... (first-of-pair has lower seed number) | ||
** Second-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, ... | ** Second-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, ... | ||
− | ** In other words, the following pattern is used to determine the white-game advantage between the first and the second of pair per rounds: 2112 2112 2112... | + | ** In other words, the following repeating pattern is used to determine the white-game advantage between the first and the second of pair per rounds: 2112 2112 2112... |
** The rationale for the 4-round pattern is that the white game difference is roughly even and uneven every second round. Thus, the pattern in flipped every second round with a total 4-round cycle. | ** The rationale for the 4-round pattern is that the white game difference is roughly even and uneven every second round. Thus, the pattern in flipped every second round with a total 4-round cycle. | ||
* '''Double rounds.''' The first-of-pair always plays with the black pieces on the first encounter, and with the white pieces on the second encounter | * '''Double rounds.''' The first-of-pair always plays with the black pieces on the first encounter, and with the white pieces on the second encounter | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notes: | ||
+ | * '''Single rounds.''' For any pair (''p1'', ''p2''): | ||
+ | ** If WGD(''p1'')=0 and WGD(''p2'')=0, then after the round: |WGD(''p1'')| + |WGD(''p2'')| = 2 | ||
+ | ** In any other case, after the round: |WGD(''p1'')| + |WGD(''p2'')| <= 2 | ||
+ | ** In other words, every player always has at most 2 more games with one color than with the other color. | ||
+ | ** Further, after an even number of games by player ''p'', WGD(p) is even. Similarly, after an odd number of games, WGD(p) is odd. Thus, after an odd number of rounds without BYE: |WGD(''p'')|=1 for every player. | ||
+ | * '''Double rounds.''' WGD(p)=0 for all players before and after the round. | ||
= Playing order within a round = | = Playing order within a round = | ||
Line 80: | Line 118: | ||
* '''Single rounds.''' Pairs are ordered by the pairing order of the first-of-pair (DESC). That is, the worst-performing pair plays first. | * '''Single rounds.''' Pairs are ordered by the pairing order of the first-of-pair (DESC). That is, the worst-performing pair plays first. | ||
* '''Double rounds.''' The single round schedule is executed twice. That is, the second encounter with reversed colors is after every pair has played once. | * '''Double rounds.''' The single round schedule is executed twice. That is, the second encounter with reversed colors is after every pair has played once. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:TCEC Swiss|Swiss]] |
Latest revision as of 22:26, 8 March 2021
TCEC Swiss Tournament System is a variant of the Swiss tournament format. It is completely deterministic with a reasonably simple rule set, resembling the Monrad system. It can be played with any number of participants and any number of rounds. Rounds are either single or double rounds. It is designed to be played with 40-50 engines over 10-25 rounds.
Contents
General structure
There are P players and N rounds. The format is either single round or double round.
At the beginning of every round, the pairs are determined. See pairing below.
In the single round format, every pair plays once per round. Thus, there are ⌊P/2⌋ games (rounded down). In the double round format, every pair plays twice per round and the number of games is 2*⌊P/2⌋ per round. The second game is with reversed colors.
In case of an odd number of players, one player per round receives a BYE. The BYE games are scored as wins.
After all the rounds have been played, the tournament is complete. The final ranking of players is determined as per the following criteria: (priority order)
- Score (DESCending)
- Number of received BYEs (ASCending, less is better)
- Tiebreakers (e.g., number of black games DESC, SB, r-mobility score)
Recommendations:
- Even number of players
- When single rounds format is used, it is recommended to have an odd number of rounds for color balancing. There is no such recommendation for double rounds format.
- Number of rounds should generally be at most the number of players divided by 2 (approximately). If more rounds are desired, then it may be preferable to use a round-robin tournament format, instead.
- For player seeding, use either:
- Group seeding. (Use group count = players / 2 (round down) for equal distance seeding.)
- Random seeding
Seeding
Every player is assigned a unique seeding number. This determines the pairing order in the first round and is used as a secondary ordering criterion in the following rounds.
The following seeding procedures are defined:
- Random seeding.
- Group seeding. The procedure is as follows:
- Order the players by Elo rating (highest first)
- Divide the players into N roughly equal sized groups: Group A = strongest players, Group B = next strongest, etc. If the division is not even, then have stronger groups with one more player than the weaker groups.
- For example: 11 players into 4 groups: Groups A-C have 4 players and D has 3 players
- For increasing seeding numbers, first pick a player from group A, then from group B, then from group C, etc, and reiterate from group A until every player has been seeded. Pick always the strongest unseeded player from a group
- For example: 11 players in 4 groups. S1=A1, S2=B1, S3=C1, S4=D1, S5=A2, ... (S<n> = seed n, A1 is strongest player in group A)
Notes:
- Equal distance seeding may be used to promote the expected top encounters as late as possible
- Random seeding also works
- The 1st round pairing is: seed2-seed1, seed4-seed3, seed6-seed5, ...
Round pairing
STEP 1
Pairing starts by ranking the players by:
- Score (DESC; i.e., the top player has the highest score)
- Seed (ASC)
This ranking is called the pairing order.
Notes:
- Every round (incl. the first round) uses the same pairing ordering scheme.
- The ranking for pairing is different to final ranking.
STEP 2
In case of an odd number of players, the player to receive the BYE is determined as follows. Order the players by:
- Number of received BYEs (DESC)
- Pairing order (ASC)
The bottom player receives the BYE.
That is, the worst-performing player that has not yet received a BYE receives one. If every player has already received a BYE, then the worst-performing player that has received a single BYE receives one. And so on.
STEP 3
Determine whether there exists a viable pairing for the round. If no viable pairings exist, remove the earliest round in the encounter history. Repeat this as necessary until a viable pairing exists. The removals are permanent, i.e., they carry over to the following rounds.
Players p1 and p2 are allowed to be paired if all of the below conditions are met:
- The players have not yet met as per the encounter history
- The color balancing conditions:
- If either player has white game difference +2, then the other player must have white game difference of at most 0.
- If either player has white game difference -2, then the other player must have white game difference of at least 0.
Notes:
- White game difference for player p = WGD(p) = (games played by player p with the white pieces) - (games played by player p with the back pieces)
- WGD(p) is unaffected by the possible round removals in the encounter history
- The Blossom algorithm can be used to determine efficiently whether there exists a viable pairing. Create a graph where the players are represented by vertices and the allowed pairings are represented by non-directional edges. That is, edge p1-p2 exists iff:
- Players p1 and p2 have not met (as per the encounter history); and
- The color balancing conditions between p1 and p2 are met. That is: |WGD(p1) + WGD(p2)| <= 2
- When there are an even number of players (i.e., no BYE rounds), then the color balancing conditions ensure that every player has white game difference +1 or -1 after an odd number of rounds.
STEP 4
Perform pairing. The players are paired one by one in the pairing order as follows:
- Pick the first unpaired player by the pairing order. Mark the player as paired. This player is called the first-of-pair.
- Pick the highest-ranked unpaired player as the second-of-pair that maintains the following criteria:
- The pairing condition is met (see STEP 3); and
- The viability of the round pairing is maintained (see STEP 3)
Do this until every player has been paired. Add pairs in the encounter history for this round.
Notes:
- The possible BYE player is not considered for pairing
STEP 5
Determine playing colors for each pair:
- Single rounds. Determine which player of the pair has the greater white game difference (i.e., games played as white - games played as black). The player with the greater white game difference gets the black pieces. In case the difference equals, then the player with the higher score gets the black pieces. If both players have the same score, then the following formula is used:
- First-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, ... (first-of-pair has lower seed number)
- Second-of-pair receives the white pieces on rounds 1, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, ...
- In other words, the following repeating pattern is used to determine the white-game advantage between the first and the second of pair per rounds: 2112 2112 2112...
- The rationale for the 4-round pattern is that the white game difference is roughly even and uneven every second round. Thus, the pattern in flipped every second round with a total 4-round cycle.
- Double rounds. The first-of-pair always plays with the black pieces on the first encounter, and with the white pieces on the second encounter
Notes:
- Single rounds. For any pair (p1, p2):
- If WGD(p1)=0 and WGD(p2)=0, then after the round: |WGD(p1)| + |WGD(p2)| = 2
- In any other case, after the round: |WGD(p1)| + |WGD(p2)| <= 2
- In other words, every player always has at most 2 more games with one color than with the other color.
- Further, after an even number of games by player p, WGD(p) is even. Similarly, after an odd number of games, WGD(p) is odd. Thus, after an odd number of rounds without BYE: |WGD(p)|=1 for every player.
- Double rounds. WGD(p)=0 for all players before and after the round.
Playing order within a round
- Single rounds. Pairs are ordered by the pairing order of the first-of-pair (DESC). That is, the worst-performing pair plays first.
- Double rounds. The single round schedule is executed twice. That is, the second encounter with reversed colors is after every pair has played once.