I noticed you can't create a problem that requires scientific notation nor
enter an answer in scientific notation without using "X" instead of "*"
for multiplication.
Why? Aren't students expecting to use "*" since that is what they use
everywhere else for multiplication?
cs
DOCUMENT();
loadMacros(
"PGstandard.pl",
"PGML.pl",
"MathObjects.pl",
"PGcourse.pl",
"parserNumberWithUnits.pl",
"contextArbitraryString.pl",
"parserPopUp.pl",
"contextInequalities.pl",
"contextScientificNotation.pl",
);
TEXT(beginproblem());
$showPartialCorrectAnswers = 1;
######################################################################
Context("ScientificNotation");
BEGIN_PGML
See if you can enter 1230 in scientific notation.
[____________]{Compute("1.23 x 10**3")}
END_PGML
######################################################################
ENDDOCUMENT();
Why scientific notation requires "X" instead of "*" for multiplication? Aren't students conditioned to use "*" everywhere?
by Christian Seberino - Number of replies: 1
In reply to Christian Seberino
Re: Why scientific notation requires "X" instead of "*" for multiplication? Aren't students conditioned to use "*" everywhere?
by Davide Cervone -
It's because that's what the person who requested this context required. It was designed for use in a high-school course where the notational requirements were very strict.
If you want to use *
for the multiplication, you can add it into the context as follows:
Context("ScientificNotation"); Context()->operators->add( '*' => {precedence => 3, associativity => 'left', type => 'bin', TeX => '\times ', class => 'ScientificNotation::BOP::x'}, );so you can enter
1.23*10^3
, but the output will still show the x
. Changing that would require using a subclass of the Scientific notation class, and that is a bit more work.
Also, note that you don't have to use Compute()
for your PGML. You could just use
BEGIN_PGML See if you can enter 1230 in scientific notation. [____________]{"1.23 x 10**3"} END_PGMLto get the same effect.